<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just checking in&#8230;.</title>
	<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2003/11/18/just-checking-in-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kaitlin Birdie</title>
		<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2003/11/18/just-checking-in-1/#comment-806</link>
		<author>Kaitlin Birdie</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 06:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2003/11/18/just-checking-in-1/#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Alright who was it? Who told that I've already gained 5 pounds? Whoops.
Gail
Two weeks, two days, 22 hours, 2 minutes and 38 seconds. 422 cigarettes not
smoked, saving $69.79. Life saved: 1 day, 11 hours, 10 minutes.
Here, a cognitive quitter will consider:
"If I'm eating as an alternative to smoking, than all I'm doing is
replacing one innappropriate behavior with another, that's just spinning my
wheels. The issue isn't how dangerous one response is compared to another
and then choosing the less dangerous one. The issue is about changing my
responses so that they address the events I'm encountering in an
appropriate, efficient, effective, and timely manner. "</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright who was it? Who told that I&#8217;ve already gained 5 pounds? Whoops.<br />
Gail<br />
Two weeks, two days, 22 hours, 2 minutes and 38 seconds. 422 cigarettes not<br />
smoked, saving $69.79. Life saved: 1 day, 11 hours, 10 minutes.<br />
Here, a cognitive quitter will consider:<br />
&#8220;If I&#8217;m eating as an alternative to smoking, than all I&#8217;m doing is<br />
replacing one innappropriate behavior with another, that&#8217;s just spinning my<br />
wheels. The issue isn&#8217;t how dangerous one response is compared to another<br />
and then choosing the less dangerous one. The issue is about changing my<br />
responses so that they address the events I&#8217;m encountering in an<br />
appropriate, efficient, effective, and timely manner. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hassan_11</title>
		<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2003/11/18/just-checking-in-1/#comment-794</link>
		<author>hassan_11</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2003/11/18/just-checking-in-1/#comment-794</guid>
		<description>In a message dated 18/01/02 13:37:05 GMT Standard Time, tiko_chloie@...
writes:
Tiko
Pain was always a very good trigger for me (and still is to some extent) -
you really need to get some foundation statements in place and start abcing
otherwise you area going to carry on as you are - which is where I was before
I started doing it this way (running around like a hamster in a wheel and not
getting anywhere:)
Keep on thinking
Indi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a message dated 18/01/02 13:37:05 GMT Standard Time, <a href="mailto:tiko_chloie@...">tiko_chloie@&#8230;</a><br />
writes:<br />
Tiko<br />
Pain was always a very good trigger for me (and still is to some extent) -<br />
you really need to get some foundation statements in place and start abcing<br />
otherwise you area going to carry on as you are - which is where I was before<br />
I started doing it this way (running around like a hamster in a wheel and not<br />
getting anywhere:)<br />
Keep on thinking<br />
Indi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raleigh Missy</title>
		<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2003/11/18/just-checking-in-1/#comment-792</link>
		<author>Raleigh Missy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2003/11/18/just-checking-in-1/#comment-792</guid>
		<description>There are some fairly fundamental differences between quitting cognitively
 and quitting as it's done in most other quit venues.
 In other places we hear:
 "Since I stopped smoking, I'm eating nonstop and I've gained way too much
 weight. But, at least I'm not smoking"
 and the 'enabling' reply comes back....:
 "Good for you! You can always lose the weight later. One issue at a time."
 Here, a cognitive quitter will consider:
 "If I'm eating as an alternative to smoking, than all I'm doing is
 replacing one innappropriate behavior with another, that's just spinning my
 wheels. The issue isn't how dangerous one response is compared to another
 and then choosing the less dangerous one. The issue is about changing my
 responses so that they address the events I'm encountering in an
 appropriate, efficient, effective, and timely manner. "
 In other places we hear:
 &lt;!--more--&gt;
 "I slipped and smoked a few. But look at all the cigarettes I haven't smoked."
 the reply...:
 "Good for you! That's progress. Keep getting back on the wagon. Never quit
 quitting."
 Here a cognitive quitter will consider:
 "Given my professed goals, a slip is a failure to respond appropriately to
 a particular situation. A slip only provides the precedent and
 rationalization for the next slip. A cognitive quit is not about counting
 beans. If I've not examined the slip and developed some rational ABCs so
 that the next time I'll be prepared to respond differenly, then the next
 instance of a forgotten patch or an unexpected mess will qualify as a
 'valid reason' to smoke.
 Tiko, I'm sure I missed your answer the last time I asked, so please
 forgive me for asking again but, 1- Have you written out some foundation
 statements? and 2- Have you written out any ABCs yet?
 Steve
 www.cognitivequitting.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some fairly fundamental differences between quitting cognitively<br />
 and quitting as it&#8217;s done in most other quit venues.<br />
 In other places we hear:<br />
 &#8220;Since I stopped smoking, I&#8217;m eating nonstop and I&#8217;ve gained way too much<br />
 weight. But, at least I&#8217;m not smoking&#8221;<br />
 and the &#8216;enabling&#8217; reply comes back&#8230;.:<br />
 &#8220;Good for you! You can always lose the weight later. One issue at a time.&#8221;<br />
 Here, a cognitive quitter will consider:<br />
 &#8220;If I&#8217;m eating as an alternative to smoking, than all I&#8217;m doing is<br />
 replacing one innappropriate behavior with another, that&#8217;s just spinning my<br />
 wheels. The issue isn&#8217;t how dangerous one response is compared to another<br />
 and then choosing the less dangerous one. The issue is about changing my<br />
 responses so that they address the events I&#8217;m encountering in an<br />
 appropriate, efficient, effective, and timely manner. &#8221;<br />
 In other places we hear:<br />
 <!--more--><br />
 &#8220;I slipped and smoked a few. But look at all the cigarettes I haven&#8217;t smoked.&#8221;<br />
 the reply&#8230;:<br />
 &#8220;Good for you! That&#8217;s progress. Keep getting back on the wagon. Never quit<br />
 quitting.&#8221;<br />
 Here a cognitive quitter will consider:<br />
 &#8220;Given my professed goals, a slip is a failure to respond appropriately to<br />
 a particular situation. A slip only provides the precedent and<br />
 rationalization for the next slip. A cognitive quit is not about counting<br />
 beans. If I&#8217;ve not examined the slip and developed some rational ABCs so<br />
 that the next time I&#8217;ll be prepared to respond differenly, then the next<br />
 instance of a forgotten patch or an unexpected mess will qualify as a<br />
 &#8216;valid reason&#8217; to smoke.<br />
 Tiko, I&#8217;m sure I missed your answer the last time I asked, so please<br />
 forgive me for asking again but, 1- Have you written out some foundation<br />
 statements? and 2- Have you written out any ABCs yet?<br />
 Steve<br />
 <a href="http://www.cognitivequitting.com" rel="nofollow">www.cognitivequitting.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
