<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: abc question?</title>
	<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2005/02/26/abc-question/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Raleigh Missy</title>
		<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2005/02/26/abc-question/#comment-1905</link>
		<author>Raleigh Missy</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2005/02/26/abc-question/#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>Don't smoke? Enjoy that you don't think a cig will 'fix the
problem'? I'm not too clear why there's a question.
Maybe move on to the second stage of ABCing ... where you don't really
need a separate ABC for would have been back as a smoker. Simply do one ABC
for the situation and you include the 'old statement' within the B where
it's immediately refuted.
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t smoke? Enjoy that you don&#8217;t think a cig will &#8216;fix the<br />
problem&#8217;? I&#8217;m not too clear why there&#8217;s a question.<br />
Maybe move on to the second stage of ABCing &#8230; where you don&#8217;t really<br />
need a separate ABC for would have been back as a smoker. Simply do one ABC<br />
for the situation and you include the &#8216;old statement&#8217; within the B where<br />
it&#8217;s immediately refuted.<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
