<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Body cue workshop</title>
	<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2007/03/26/body-cue-workshop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Raleigh Missy</title>
		<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2007/03/26/body-cue-workshop/#comment-3245</link>
		<author>Raleigh Missy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2007/03/26/body-cue-workshop/#comment-3245</guid>
		<description>Yes, the craves will continue to return as long as there's a fluctuating
nic level. Sounds like you're already dealing with the body cues via
breathing and stretching.
How many cigarettes are you smoking a day at this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the craves will continue to return as long as there&#8217;s a fluctuating<br />
nic level. Sounds like you&#8217;re already dealing with the body cues via<br />
breathing and stretching.<br />
How many cigarettes are you smoking a day at this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raleigh Missy</title>
		<link>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2007/03/26/body-cue-workshop/#comment-3244</link>
		<author>Raleigh Missy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smoking.wordpress-by.org/2007/03/26/body-cue-workshop/#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>Bonnie,
 My apologies, somehow that post slipped past me.
 
 You've identified the body cues and associated them with very reasonable
 and effective responses. This looks perfect to me. I can't see how you
 could improve on it.
 The only thing I would mention, and I'm sure you're aware of this, is that
 just because we come up with appropriate responses doesn't necessarily
 guarantee that we'll feel 'better'. We can relieve the body cues of
 loneliness, but the soul sadness remains. This holds true for situations
 other than loneliness as well. We can relieve the body cues of stress, but
 the stressor may remain. We can relieve the body cues of anger, but the
 event that resulted in anger may remain.
 Smoking was a response to body cues. When we deal with the body cues, we've
 dealt with the smoking. Life, unfortunately, is a different matter altogether.
 &lt;!--more--&gt;
 When can we catch up in chat?
 Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie,<br />
 My apologies, somehow that post slipped past me.</p>
<p> You&#8217;ve identified the body cues and associated them with very reasonable<br />
 and effective responses. This looks perfect to me. I can&#8217;t see how you<br />
 could improve on it.<br />
 The only thing I would mention, and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware of this, is that<br />
 just because we come up with appropriate responses doesn&#8217;t necessarily<br />
 guarantee that we&#8217;ll feel &#8216;better&#8217;. We can relieve the body cues of<br />
 loneliness, but the soul sadness remains. This holds true for situations<br />
 other than loneliness as well. We can relieve the body cues of stress, but<br />
 the stressor may remain. We can relieve the body cues of anger, but the<br />
 event that resulted in anger may remain.<br />
 Smoking was a response to body cues. When we deal with the body cues, we&#8217;ve<br />
 dealt with the smoking. Life, unfortunately, is a different matter altogether.<br />
 <!--more--><br />
 When can we catch up in chat?<br />
 Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
