a question and another

Answers often present more questions and questions often lead to more
questions.
When I was a smoker, I thought I smoked because I was stressed. I
smoked because I was angry, I was tired, I needed one… just because.
So if I smoked because I was angry and I didn’t want to smoke, were
my only two options;
1- don’t smoke (been there, done that, didn’t know how to make ‘not
smoking’ work), or
2- don’t get angry (didn’t know how to do that either)?
Anyone see a third option?

2 Responses to “a question and another”

  1. Kelvin Janessa Says:

    That will work. Still, what led you to consider even dealing with
    body cues?

  2. Kelvin Janessa Says:

    Hmm. Is that the same principle that sent you reaching for a
    cigarette about 2.5yrs ago, before you quit? :) I believe that every living organism is possessed of a biological
    imperative to try and move from any state of discomfort to a more
    comfortable one. Otherwise, how would that organism continue to exist?
    Nicotine, delivered by inhalation, works almost instantly and it
    works well. In fact, smokers are experts at dosing themselves to
    provide the expected and necessary degree of comfort. When I was
    angry and lit up, the first couple of drags I sucked smoke down to my
    toes. I was doing what had always worked to create move from
    discomfort to more comfortable. How did you smoke when you were
    angry? Any of you?
    Why did I light up? Because it was the only effective response I had
    for the experience of anger.
    Why bother looking for other responses if smoking works? Because my

    higher brain had decided that it was time to quit smoking, which
    brings me to oranges.
    Anger is a concept that, taken as a whole, is just too big to handle.
    It’s like trying to get your arms around a peeled orange the size of
    a car. You might be able to nudge it in some direction, but you have
    no fine control. Imagine that your orange/anger has segments labeled
    in general categories like Intellectual, Emotional, and Physical.
    One of the Intellectual segments might be “I can’t believe I’m
    working with such a moron.” Another might be “How many times must I
    tell them before it registers?” When angry, two of the segments in
    the physical category are usually “Breathing” and “Muscle tension”.
    Judy, today when you get angry, or stressed in any other way, you
    look to your body cues for clues to proper responses.
    And as soon as you recognize a body cue, the proper response is often
    self evident. If you observe that your breathing is lousy, you take a
    deep breath. It doesn’t get any simpler than that.
    However, a person isn’t likely to be looking for individual segments,
    like breathing, unless they’ve changed their perception
    of anger/stress from one of a ‘car sized orange’ to one of a ‘car
    sized orange in segments’, some of which can be manipulated. The
    moron will still be a your co-worker, and you’ll probably have to
    explain yet again. But, you can change at least two of the segments
    in the physical category and this is a critical point… to
    disconnect the smoking response to stress, all you have to do is
    change a few of the segments in the physical category. Ask any of our
    long term quitters.
    The ‘because/when’ question was an effort to get people to look
    beyond the surface of stress to it’s parts. I don’t think it worked
    too well. Lets have an orange instead and see where we get.
    Steve

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.